**What is Edtimes?** ED Times is a youth media publication founded in 2015 and headquartered in Delhi, India. It focuses on stories and issues relevant to Indian millennials by providing news and opinions created by young people themselves. The platform aims to change the reading habits of young India by promoting responsible journalism. ED Times has gained recognition such as the BEST BLOG award at India Digital Summit Awards 2019. **How does it work?** ED Times operates as a digital news publication where stories are curated and published online with an emphasis on youth perspectives and engagement. It produces content that encourages millennials to comment and interact, creating a community space focused on news and opinions relevant to young Indians. ED Times is also active in media forums like the World Economic Forum’s Global Council on Media & Entertainment, enhancing its visibility in new media. **Products and services** ED Times offers digital journalism services including news articles, opinion pieces, interviews, and editorial content tailored for youth audiences. It publishes content primarily through its website targeting millennial readers interested in socio-political and cultural topics. The platform focuses on creating responsible, youth-centric media content and strives to remain a key source for millennial-centric news in India.
Response rate: 0%
Yeah, a lot of users mention that Edtimes has biased coverage, especially when it comes to not reporting negative news about their clients. Honestly, some find it frustrating since they expect more balanced journalism.
Some users have pointed out that the moderation isn't great, which can lead to discussions feeling one-sided or not very open. People definitely seem to want more transparency in how comments and stories are handled.
Yeah, there are mentions of Edtimes being considered a bad ed tech company by some users. They feel that it doesn’t really meet the needs of its audience effectively.
While they claim to promote responsible journalism, some folks feel that their reporting is sometimes lacking in objectivity. This makes readers question how well they're really achieving that goal.
A lot of users appreciate that the content is aimed at younger audiences, but some criticize it for lacking depth and being too biased. It seems like they're trying, but it doesn’t always hit the mark for everyone.
Edtimes encourages comments and interactions, but a few users have mentioned that the platform sometimes limits discourse by removing critical comments. It’s kind of a mixed bag as to how engaged the community feels.